Tongchui M1

CaveatIn the structured spec table - no 'approx.' mark. CONTRADICTED by the page's own marketing card: approx. 30kg own weight (the lightest in its class), approx. 30kg sustained working load, achieving a near-1:1 load-to-weight ratio, industry-first for quadrupeds. The two figures (41kg vs. 30kg) are the SAME robot's own weight on the SAME page and are in conflict. Rule 9: not silently corrected. The structured table is used as the field value because it is the more specific source (same principle as the rest of the GENISOM entries), but the inconsistency is not explained away.

NoteNO 'approx.' mark on this row, unlike L1/L2's corresponding measurements. No operator set, per rule 4 (never invent a caveat the manufacturer did not write).

NoteThe prone (lying-down) measurement is 930×630×200mm; the schema has no field for that state.

CaveatNumber of joint motors, in the structured table. See the top note on the meta description’s conflicting claim of 16 degrees of freedom, which is NOT used here.

CaveatMaximum load. The marketing card uses the same 30kg figure to claim a 1:1 load-to-weight ratio based on a 30kg-own-weight claim, which contradicts the structured table’s 41kg — see the caveat on weight.

NoteA separate limit speed of 8 m/s is also disclosed — not used as the main value, same principle as L1/L2/L1-W.

NoteMaximum climbable slope angle, confirmed by the marketing card’s "45° limit slope angle" — no separate standard/limit split here, unlike L1/L1-W.

Note80cm vertical obstacle-crossing height, from the page’s marketing card — kept separate from stair_step_continuous, which carries a different, lower figure in the structured spec table. Same two-field pattern as L2/L1-W.

NoteLabel: continuous stair-climbing height, in the structured spec table, confirmed by the marketing card.

NoteThe base specification (-20 to 55°C) is used; the wider -40 to 80°C is only an optional battery version, not standard.

NoteSame caveat as temperature_min: -40 to 80°C is an optional wide-temperature battery version, not the base configuration.

Caveat5h unloaded / 3.5h full load. Qualitative load condition (unloaded/full), no kg figure tied directly to this row — hence the load condition is stated as not disclosed, even though a separate maximum-load figure of 30kg sits elsewhere on the page. A range is also disclosed; the schema has no range field.

NoteConfirmed in two places on the same page: the marketing card (dual battery, hot-swap) and the accessories list (battery: 54V, 9.35Ah × 2; dual battery, hot-swap).

NoteCharging time.

NoteAccessories list: charging dock, standard equipment. The marketing text separately mentions an optional smart charging station supporting autonomous return-to-charge on low battery — optional only, not standard. Same two-tier pattern as L1/L2’s docking_station.

NoteIn the structured sensor section — confirms presence, but neither line count, model nor manufacturer is disclosed (unlike L2-W Ultra, which names its LiDAR).

NoteThe sensor section also mentions a depth camera and an RTK positioning module without further specification — the schema has no dedicated field for either.

NoteBase compute: 8-core high-performance CPU, 100 TOPS.

NoteQualitative list from the manufacturer's feature section, not a rating on a scale. Autonomous navigation is stated explicitly as OPTIONAL ('optional'), not standard.

NoteFrom the structured spec table (2+2+1+1+2+1 = 9 named ports in total). The marketing text separately claims 15 standard interfaces in total — a higher, unspecified figure, NOT used as the field value. The 9 named ports are used because they are the only itemised source; the 15 figure is noted as an unresolved discrepancy, not silently corrected.